Skip to content

Audit and review

Glossa does not stop at generating a draft. It also runs a judge stage so you can inspect quality issues chunk by chunk.

The judge is separate from generation because the model that produced a draft should not be the only reviewer of that draft. LLMs and pipelines explains the general principle.

What the judge reports

  • Overall quality rating
  • Structured issues
  • Suggested fixes
  • Terminology, accuracy, grammar, fluency, and consistency concerns

What to do after an audit pass

OutcomeNext move
Minor wording issuesEdit manually, then re-run audit
Systematic terminology driftFix glossary or phrase-memory selection
Wrong interpretationRevisit the translation prompt or provider choice
Formatting noiseNarrow the format stage instead of compensating in audit

Review loop

  1. Run a test chunk or full batch.
  2. Open the audit output for the chunk.
  3. Read the issue list against the source and translated text.
  4. Edit manually, re-run a stage, or re-run audit only.
  5. Convert persistent issues into annotations if they need editorial tracking.

When to trust the judge

The judge is best used as a second pass, not as the final authority.

  • Trust it for spotting repeated terminology drift or obvious omissions.
  • Verify it manually on nuanced register, interpretation, or philological edge cases.
  • If it keeps reporting noise, tighten the prompt or simplify the earlier stages.

Review strategy for long documents

  • Use Test mode early to calibrate the pipeline on representative chunks.
  • Use annotations to mark unresolved passages without losing context.
  • Use coherence checks when the document depends on cross-chunk consistency.
  • Export only after the chunk list is no longer carrying unresolved issues.
  • Lock stable chunks only after they have survived both manual reading and audit review.

See also

Public documentation for the Glossa desktop app